>>1321>>the guy was just appreciating the high res image
Are you referring to yourself? You're clearly the same person as the first two people who replied, but you're talking in third person. >>1316
was probably uneducated on the matter and just wanted to make a joke out of it.
If so, why did you reply twice? Were you just trying to slide other, more well-constructed threads? I'm not since I'm clearly using sage, but someone else is. Two low-quality posts have been bumped up right after I posted a well-constructed one, which nobody's replying to, hm...>also, posting a trump pic don't make you a "Trumpite civic nationalist"
It legitimises Trump, somebody actually against Trump's civic nationalist policies wouldn't do this. If you were to post an image of Bush, people would sure have the impression you're legitimising Bush.